Skip to main content

Kentucky Politics

Governor Fletcher has seen his support from Kentucky GOP organizations wither away recently. All this over his handling of the "hiring probe." Let's face it, he handled it very poorly. I don't fault him completely for that -- he was given some VERY bad advice by someone; unfortunately, he took that bad advice and it left egg on his face (and ours).

I worked very hard for Governor Fletcher when he ran against Democrat Ben Chandler in '04. I was excited about his election because I felt it meant the end of the "good old boy network" in state government -- the same Good Old Boys who have held this state back for three decades. Unfortunately, it seems Fletcher felt he could play the same old politics as the Dems when he took office and I'll never, for the life of me, figure out why he wasn't more alert to the enemies he was amongst in Frankfort.

Enough of that. If Governor Fletcher's support is truly eroding -- which, for the record, I find disgusting -- then it's because the Republicans in this state are more worried about polls and appearances than they ought to be. This governor has given us some new economic hope and worked hard to make progress that will move this state forward should he be re-elected. I frankly find the "fair weather" Republicans in this state disgusting.

With a "fair weather" team like this behind him, I can see how Governor Fletcher will struggle for re-election. We ought to be smarter than this. If we can't get behind Ernie for re-election then we ought to be begging Lt. Governor Steve Pence to run. He's a man of integrity and one of the most humble and honest public servants I've ever met. He has distanced himself, rightly so, from the political debacle brought on by some in the Fletcher administration and might stand a great chance of succeeding against a Democrat opponent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...