Skip to main content

NYT Article Highlights Our Very Own Bluegrass Institute!

Yes, even the Liberal New York Times is curious about Conservatives. Imagine that!

They gained points with this Conservative yesterday by publishing a great article, "Preaching the Gospel of Small Government." In the article, The Bluegrass Institute's Chris Derry is profiled along with Lawrence Reed of the Mackinac Center. Both men have been propelled into careers that subjugate their true earning power to their enthusiasm for a noble cause. Odd for free-market Conservatives, I must admit. They are to be admired however for taking an active role in ideas about which they feel so strongly.

While the article is a great read and does a nice job of profiling this movement and its proponents, the NYT earned a bit of my disdain by trying to discredit the very topic they wrote about by including the phrase "Preaching the Gospel" in the headline. How ridiculous! The article is about free-market Conservatism and those who are doing all in their power to help others understand it, not about Evangelical Republicans. *sigh* No matter how much "progress" I think Liberals are making toward becoming more fair-minded, they constantly provide a dose of disappointment along the way.

For those of you who see the free-market Conservative ideology as Republican partisanship, you'd do well to do your homework before coming to that conclusion. The Bluegrass Institute has taken some hard lines against actions they see as counterproductive to the goals of smaller government, free-market economics, and lower taxation. They have certainly been no sycophants for our Republican governor. Even if you disagree with free-market economics, it's likely that you care about education. Education is a big point of focus for Bluegrass Institute right now; it is certainly a cause around which to rally regardless of your political party affiliation.

Nice job, Bluegrass Institute! Please keep up the good work on behalf of true Conservatives statewide!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...