Skip to main content

Grilling Schumer -- baked beans, anyone?

Most of us are familiar with Chuckie Schumer (D-NY). Unfortunately, we're familiar with him because he's well known for being a grandstander. The guy annoys the beejeezus outta me.

So, who exposed Schumer's hypocrisy this time? Shockingly enough, it was Don Imus, talk show host on MSNBC, with regard to the current situation at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Schumer took an absolute grilling from Imus on his show (as have McCain and Lieberman, I should add).
Radio host Don Imus on Friday took an obviously flustered Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., to task for never bothering up to visit wounded soldiers at the military's Walter Reed Hospital. While Schumer was quick to blast the Bush administration for failing to maintain facilities for wounded military personnel at Walter Reed, he was apparently surprised when Imus began questioning him about his own dealings with Walter Reed.

Read the full NewsMax story here.

Let's be clear on one thing, Imus is against this war; however, he has done wonderful things in support of our troops through his involvement with the Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund. If there is any one person in the United States who can actually get away with saying he "supports the troops" while not supporting their mission, it's probably Imus.

Nice work on holding Senators accountable for their responsibilities to our veterans, Imus!

Comments

Anonymous said…
"can actually get away with saying he "supports the troops" while not supporting their mission, it's probably Imus."

Please explain?
Rena Bernard said…
Which part should I explain, Anon?

Imus has helped raise money for soldiers and their families -- he doesn't just give "support the troops" lip service, he actually uses his time to help them in ways that matter. For the record, I've never been a fan of Don Imus. I found his radio show annoying at best; however, after reading what he's done for our troops and their families regardless of his opinion of their "mission," I think much more of him.

It is my opinion that many in this country throw around the phrase "support the troops" whether verbally or on car magnets but don't bother to DO anything that actually shows their support for these brave men and women and their families.

Let me be clear about this: This hollow sentiment exists outside of whether a person is a political Conservative or a political Liberal. It's a lazy American attitude -- more concerned with the next luxury purchase than with the battle being waged to protect this country and our freedoms.

This is what makes the whole "support" thing ring hollow, in my opinion. I get tired of it. I was pleased to see someone who was against going into Iraq drop his need to be right in favor of his need to actually support the troops regardless of their mission.

When the Left in this country began saying, "We support the troops," they were quietly (blatantly in some cases) adding "but not the mission." In my mind, Anon, you cannot support the men and women fighting this war without supporting them all the way to victory.

Our troops are not kids who've fallen off their tricycles and must come home now... they are adult volunteer professionals who, despite all the coverage otherwise, are doing great things in Iraq. This war must be won for all Americans but most especially for these fine men and women who, I'm sure, would like to come home victorious knowing that they made a difference and that they and their compatriots will not have sacrificed in vain.

Was that what you wanted explained?

Popular posts from this blog

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...