Skip to main content

If it's a waste of your office's resources, AG, I say waste 'em!

It appears that Kentucky's Attorney General, Jack Conway, is more concerned with his campaign for the US Senate than he is with the sovereignty of our state. (I know, I know... it's just shocking, isn't it? A Democrat who is unconcerned with the US Constitution! Who knew?)

From the Kentucky House Republican Caucus page in Facebook:

Representative Hoover Renews Call Upon Attorney General

Share

 Today at 10:58am

Frankfort, KY- House Republican Floor Leader Jeff Hoover has once again urged Kentucky's Attorney General, Jack Conway, to join thirteen of his colleagues in challenging the constitutionality of the health care reform legislation that has been signed into law by President Barack Obama, the bill's chief advocate.

In this, the second hand delivered letter to General Conway also signed by all 35 members of the House Republican Caucus, Representative Hoover cites the recent passage and enactment of this bill as the basis for a renewed call and implores General Conway to recognize the additional $300 million annual burden this mandate will place on the taxpayers of Kentucky who can least afford such a levy in these uncertain economic times.

"This health care mandate unconstitutionally requires every American to purchase some form of health insurance, regardless of age, income or circumstances, but the pain doesn't end there," said Representative Hoover. "It also places an overbearing burden on our Commonwealth's already strained budget by forcing the expansion of Medicaid while singlehandedly ravaging our citizens' constitutional granted rights and liberties."

In a letter delivered to General Conway on January 6, Representative Hoover and the House Republican Caucus urged General Conway to join a group of his colleagues across the nation, both Democrat and Republican, in filing a lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of the national health care bill. The original request, which specifically noted the dramatically increased financial burden this bill would levy against Kentuckians as well as the "sweetheart" deals that were conspicuously added to garner support, was rejected by General Conway on the basis that it was premature and would be wasteful to use the resources of his office on such an investigation.

Representative Hoover added, "As a collective voice, our caucus is once again unanimously calling upon General Conway to carry out his duties as the chief legal officer in the Commonwealth and challenge the constitutionality of a mandate that will require individuals to buy health insurance and place a population-based tax on states. This corrupt legislation contains various provisions and federal directives that clearly violate the U.S. Constitution by infringing on each citizen's ability to control their health care choices and must not be allowed to stand."

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...