Skip to main content

Random thoughts not in the news

I can't help but blog a bit about something that has risen in my consciousness this past week or two: competition. Don't expect news links here or anything... it's simply that a number of interesting situations recently have added up to a single point of curiousity for me. Can it be that many of our political differences can be attributed to how we view the spirit of competition (good or bad)?

My 4-year-old niece recently lost at Scrabble Junior (apparently for the first time ever). She looked at me and said, "You and I both won!"

I said, "Nope. I won but you played a marvelous game!" and extended my hand for a handshake in the spirit of good gamesmanship.

She wouldn't shake it and instead answered with, "Well, it doesn't really matter who won."

What, I ask you, are they teaching her in pre-school? That if YOU aren't the winner then it really isn't necessary to acknowledge the game well-played?

While listening to a radio talk show just yesterday, I heard a caller say, "What ever happened to the spirit of unity?" when referring to American foreign policy.

I wanted to scream at the caller, "Unity is only possible after one side gets their arses kicked, you idiot!"

THIS my friends is the root of many of our political differences, I believe. Liberals want us all to simply "get along" and not worry about who wins. Conservatives value competition and understand that it makes us a better society. I really have come to the conclusion now that the differences in our American political parties are really simple. It's about how we handle competition -- Conservatives say it's good for America and we play well with others; Liberals say it's a bad thing for self-esteem and they take their ball home if they don't win.

Can it really be that simple?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Three Things No One Else Is Telling You

From: Downsizer Dispatch < downsizer-dispatch@downsizedc.org > Date: Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:38 PM Subject: Three Things No One Else Is Telling You To: conservachick@gmail.com Quote of the Day: "Things in our country run in spite of the government, not by the aid of it." -- Will Rogers (1879-1935) American humorist Unelected federal bureaucrats are forcing New York City to spend $27 million to replace their street signs. Our bureaucratic overlords maintain that streets signs must contain both upper and lower case letters, instead of just capital letters! Do you feel grateful that you're being protected from upper case streets signs? This dictatorial mandate comes from the Federal Highway Administration, and applies to every community in America, not just New York City. But don't blame this outrage on the busy-body Democrats. This isn't an Obama directive. The rule was actually promulgated back in 2003 -- during the Bush Administrat...