Skip to main content

Restoring my Faith

I did it. I did that thing that everyone tells you is a total rip-off. I ordered magazine subscriptions from two enterprising young men who knocked on my door six weeks or so ago. Both were about 18 years old and said they were trying to earn money for college. One, a black kid from Virginia, was "in training" with the more outgoing Hispanic from California. They shook my hand and were quite respectful of my time and managed to find the right level of salesmanship required to sell me.

Now, I admit, I was a little hesitant. I don't consider myself an easy mark (unless you start talking about romance, in which case I'm a total sucker). I've heard for many years about the scam of buying magazine subscriptions from people peddling them door-to-door. These young men sat down and told me what they wanted to do with their lives. The Hispanic kid said his mother had been in jail for narcotics violations but she encouraged him to work hard and not follow in her footsteps. They seemed very bright and full of promise.

Maybe it was the remark made by the Hispanic kid about Conservatives ("We almost always get welcomed into the home by Conservatives. It seems like they're happy to see us out working to make money.") or maybe it was the confidence with which they told me their plans for their futures. I don't know. All I know is that I bought. I bought charity subscriptions for two local children's hospitals and one for myself.

My faith has been restored in doing good things for kids trying to get ahead as my first issue of Popular Mechanics arrived today. Fellas, wherever you are, thanks for restoring my faith in helping people who are willing to work hard for their own futures!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...