Skip to main content

Anti-American Propaganda Feeds Islamofascists

If there is any doubt that the propaganda generated by American Bush-haters is being used by Islamofascist internet sites to further their own agenda, doubt no more. This very same organization hosts a forum called e-Jihad.net whose readers include the "believer" responsible for this post to the site:

The Quran calls on to fight the unbelievers, which are atheists and polytheists, such like trinitarian Christians, Hindus, etc., in summary: liars. Even Jesus said that he did not come to bring peace to the world, but a sword. Therefore I am not surprised that the terrorists have chosen the USA as a target for their actions, because the USA have turned the meaning of the words „In God we trust“ upside down, they sold huge amounts of weaponry to the Middle East and with their interference in Middle East affairs they represent a threat to the world peace.

Americans providing aid and comfort to the enemy in any form whatsoever are traitors. Internet flash files, cartoons, ranting opinions and bile-spewing hatred for our country are just as much a comfort to the enemy as providing them with weapons.

Leftist Liberals who claim to be patriotic by bashing our country and our President are only lying to themselves. The rest of us know, with full clarity, that Islamofascists would wipe them from the face of the Earth just as quickly as they would those of us who believe in the greatness of our country and her actions to stop this plague.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You are exactly right about that....these terrorists would just as soon kill one of the bleeding hearts as anybody...it would only be easier for them as the bleeding heart would lower his head for the terrorist to cut it off!

Popular posts from this blog

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...