Skip to main content

Attila the Hun and Me

At the risk of appearing to excuse any wrong-doing that may have taken place in Haditha, it bears pointing out that war is a risky venture at best. A civilized country places it's civilized citizens in harm's way with nothing but their training, weapons, and protective gear, and asks them to execute a WAR in a civil manner. Things are bound to go wrong, badly wrong, a small percentage of the time.

On my best day, in day-to-day personal/political conflicts, there are probably times when, if I were Attila the Hun, I would stop the diplomacy and just shred the very fiber of the mortal being in front of me out of sheer frustration. Okay... maybe that's just me... The point is that we ask our troops to do very dangerous things: they put their lives at risk on a 24-7 basis in warzones; they watch their compatriots die in battle; and, then we (in the safety of our homes) are outraged when their emotions overwhelm their training and they (allegedly) go on a rampage? I don't find this the least bit surprising but maybe I'm a realist. Punish them if they are guilty but save your outrage for someone who commits heinous crimes when his life is not threatened 24-7 and he's not watching his friends dropping dead next to him.

While I will await the official verdict on the incident in Haditha, I cannot help but feel for all of the men and women serving honorably and professionally in a warzone who must now watch the sensational reporting on this incident. A few Marines who are now under investigation will throw a scorching light of distrust and disgust on all of our troops. This will happen regardless of the final verdict in the investigation and/or trial of those Marines. It behooves us all to remember that we ask a lot of our troops and 99% of them deliver above and beyond what we ask of them. God bless and keep them all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...