Skip to main content

Conduct Unbecoming Americans

Evidently Senator John F. Kerry is not the "officer" he likes to brag that he once was in Vietnam. His remark to a crowd on Monday at Pasadena City College -- "If you make an effort to be smart, you can do well," he said. "If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq." -- was a direct and unforgivable attack on the intelligence of patriots serving our country right now. How dare he?!

I have been fuming about this since I read it on Monday. Our troops are risking their lives to ensure our safety and freedoms so that Kerry can act as the Rodney Dangerfield of the Democrat party. This is the thanks they get? It's beyond belief. I agree with Senator John McCain and President Bush: Kerry owes our troops an apology. Stop blaming other veterans for your own words and actions -- be a man for once and apologize.

Murtha calls our troops "cold blooded killers" before they've even been tried; CNN airs terrorist propaganda; Kerry insults the intelligence of our troops; and every night this week I've heard one media outlet or another talk about the "deadliest month in Iraq." While the media is correct, statistically speaking, they fail to put these deaths into context -- October is the month before our elections; terrorists want to use American media to change public support for this war -- this is exactly the kind of headline that Islamofascist terrorists want to see. Al Qaeda leadership have stated as much in almost every communication with regard to strategy. Every time an American feeds Al Qaeda's media war against our troops, they are acting as nothing more than another "hirabah."

I do not suffer fools gladly. It's time for these American fools to wise up and stop playing right into the hands of Islamofascists who will annihilate all infidels regardless of political party. Stop playing games with the future of this great nation, Libs. There is a war on and it's imperative to win it.

It's a damned shame that some Americans don't support their fellow Americans anymore. What has become of patriotism and honor?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...