Skip to main content

Findling: A voice of honesty in Ms. Magazine?

As some of you know, I do not take the issue of abortion lightly; nor do I approach it as an issue that is solely religious, scientific, or political. It is much larger than that. It is an issue of the heart and of the mind. It is a "choice" that, when taken lightly, can ruin the life of the woman who makes it. I speak from personal experience and am only able to do so because I dealt with it before it cost me my life. Others are not always so fortunate.

I saw this article and thought, "oh great, more false pride over a devastating 'choice'." Then, as I read it, I realized that only one woman in the crowd of feminist voices was being honest with herself and with women who might actually read the "We Had Abortions" issue of Ms. Magazine. Thank God for women like Debbie Findling of San Francisco! From the article:
She says too many of her allies in the abortion-rights movement tend to minimize, at least publicly, the psychological impact of abortion.

"It's emotionally devastating," she said in a phone interview. "I don't regret my decision but I regret having been put in the position to have to make that choice. It's something I'll live with for the rest of my life."
Debbie, as one who had to deal with her own grief over "choice," I appreciate your voice of sanity and honesty. I am glad that Ms. Magazine didn't drop you from the list because you chose to be honest. Thank you for your words. I hope that young women worldwide read and understand your words because it could save their lives one day.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I do not advocate a total ban on abortion in the United States. I believe it is sometimes a sad but necessary procedure that should remain available (without government funding). However, I do advocate very tight restrictions and much better education on the psychological impact of abortion on the mother. Abortion, which is so lightly called "choice," is life-altering in ways that young women will not immediately understand nor recognize without help.

I once stood among pro-lifers outside of a local abortion clinic in Louisville. And sadly, I must tell you that protesting with cries of "don't kill your baby!" does no good. Young women who make this "choice" out of fear or out of a desire to continue their lives undisturbed by an inconvenient pregnancy will not respond to that emotional cry. They are fearful and self-focused.

For these young women to stop and consider what they are doing, they need to know that their psychological well-being will be jeopardized in ways they are not able to recognize, in ways that may ruin their lives and their wills to live. A woman's body knows when she's a mother and knows when she's killed the life inside her -- that is a wound to the heart and the mind that no young woman expects and very few will be equipped to deal with honestly until it's too late. One young death is a shame but two young deaths is a tragedy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...