Skip to main content

First Packages "From Home"


A few months ago some friends and I formed a little group called "From Home." The concept was to gather together "Americans supporting Americans" who wanted to contribute resources, time, and money to create and send care packages to local soldiers deployed overseas in harm's way.

We created a small forum on Louisville Mojo to organize the effort and a number of Mojo folks joined us as we planned for our first package mission. We keep a continuously updated list of soldiers from names and addresses sent to us by other soldiers, friends, and family members. This list was used to mail the first six packages on Saturday, October 14th.

"From Home" met at the Buechel Fire Department -- thanks for your support, firefighters! -- to compile our first batch of care packages. We pooled enough snacks, reading material, socks, pipe cleaners, stockings (not to WEAR, mind you, but to cover the tops of combat boots at night to keep the creepy crawlers out), and greetings to send out six packages.

Six care packages may not sound like much but it's a beginning. It's our small contribution to our local heroes; we simply want them to know that there are people "from home" who are thinking of them and appreciate all that they do for us.





Living lives of safety and freedom daily, it's not hard to forget that this country is at war; however, there are brave men and women overseas ensuring that we can continue to do so. Those of us who know service members or have veterans in our families instinctively understand that there is always something we can do to support and remember those brave men and women in harm's way.

Thank you to everyone who showed up for the first mission. We plan to do a "package-palooza" each month. If you'd like to join us here in Louisville or if you know a soldier from this area who should be on our list, please check out the "From Home" forum on Louisville Mojo or email me for information.

(L to R: Leanne, Jesse, Paul, Amanda, Dawn, and Mark)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...