Skip to main content

Kentucky's Supreme Court

The majority of the noise on the airwaves (both TV and radio) has been about the US House and Senate races. Rightly so as there is much at stake this year for the nation as a whole in the results of each individual race. However, EVERY race is important. If you don't pay regular attention to Kentucky's Supreme Court, you may not know that there are five out of seven seats to fill on the Court this election! Time to brush up on your candidates and make some proper choices at the polls, Kentuckians.

Here's a brief overview of the seats on Kentucky's Supreme Court. Click the links on that page to drill down for more detail. Take a look at the seats up for election in the other states as well.

Just as on the US Supreme Court, some of the Justices on Supreme Court of Kentucky have been guilty of legislating from the bench. Therefore, it's extremely important this year that we elect Supreme Court justices who will adjudicate based on our state constitution. Novel idea, isn't it? ;o)

I think Marcus Carey is worthy of your support for Kentucky Supreme Court Justice. Here's why: He's a Conservative and as such is determined to adjudicate rather than legislate from the bench; and, since he felt it was important to be able to freely discuss his political affiliation and faith during his campaign, he filed and won a lawsuit -- the decision in his case makes it clear that he and other candidates are now allowed to exercise their First Amendment rights. Yes, even a judicial candidate! His political affiliation and his faith are readily on display -- there's no misunderstanding of what this man is about. All good reasons in my book.

Jeff did a great write-up about Marcus Carey on his blog, Blue Grass, Red State. Please read more about him there if you are still deciding on your votes for the Supreme Court.

So folks, do your homework and be at the polls Nov. 7th sharp and ready to mold the future of this state and the nation!

(Thanks, Tim, for the link to the Federalist Society white paper link. I always appreciate interesting material!)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...