Skip to main content

A perv is a perv... unless he's a Democrat?

I've had just about all I can stand of the nonsense surrounding various calls for Speaker Hastert to step down due to his handling of the Foley mess. And, dare I mention the load of articles predicting the demise of the Republican party in midterm elections because of Foley? It's getting ridiculous. The guys at Powerline, as usual, have it right.

Let's get this straight, folks: a pervert is a pervert regardless of his political affiliation. They come in all flavors -- heterosexual, gay, black, white, Conservative, Liberal -- get the picture? The American public understand this and will vote the way they intend to vote regardless of which party Foley is a member. It is nonsense to assume, as many in the MSM seem to be doing, that this inappropriate and reprehensible behavior will impact an entire political party. We all know that perverts exist in all walks of life and are not just members of one party or the other. Can it possibly be that we, the people, see things more clearly than the liberal elites who write the newspapers? *gasp!*

As for Hastert's handling of the situation, I understand that he handled it per the parents' wishes when they contacted him about the "overly familiar" email exchanges between Foley and their son. The REAL issue is that the transcripts of instant messaging (IM) exchanges did not come to light until years after they actually happened. Who had them? Why were they not released to the proper authorities immediately? If there is blame to be laid on anyone other than Foley himself it is with the person who knew about and held this information. THAT is the sickest part of this whole mess.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...