Skip to main content

Fauxpublicans

From the Patriot Post Digest 06-48:

GOP members refuse to sign tax pledge

Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform made it very simple: If you are an elected official and you say that you will not raise taxes, then sign a simple pledge saying so. We’d like to believe that every Republican would sign it, because one of the core beliefs of Republicanism is small government and low taxes. Yet there are 15 members of the GOP House and Senate caucuses who have yet to put their signatures on Norquist’s Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

For those of you who see your representatives listed below, do demand that they sign the pledge.

In the House: Christopher Shays (CT), Michael Castle (DE), Steve Buyer (IN), Harold Rogers (KY), Vernon Ehlers (MI), Ralph Regula (OH), Todd Russell Platts (PA), Frank Wolf (VA).

In the Senate: Richard Lugar (IN), Charles Grassley (IA), Olympia Snowe (ME), Susan Collins (ME), Thad Cochran (MS), Pete Domenici (NM), George Voinovich (OH).
Americans for Tax Reform is an organization that supports the idea of a flat tax as a reform vehicle. It seems entirely possible that some of these Republicans did not sign the pledge because they have pledged their support to Americans for Fair Taxation which supports tax reform via the FairTax. Therefore, to be fair, I checked the list of FairTax supporters in Congress to see if they might be supporting a different plan for tax reform instead.

Good news! One Senator on the list above is actually a FairTax supporter: Richard Lugar (R-IN) supports tax reform but supports it via the FairTax plan. Therefore, it's entirely reasonable for him not to sign the pledge proferred by an organization that supports the flat tax. Lugar is definitely a tax reformer.

Bad news! The other 14 Republicans on the list above have forgotten core Conservative values: they support NO tax reform whatsoever. They are not interested in our core value of low taxes, less government. They are simply Fauxpublicans.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi Dawn,

Not to be a wet blanket, but isn't this group now under investigation by the Justice Department because of its relationship with convicted Lobbyist Jack Abramoff? My understanding is that Grover Norquist has hired a legal team in anticipation of an indictment.

------------

Report Says Nonprofits Sold Influence to Abramoff

By James V. Grimaldi and Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writers

snip

Five conservative nonprofit organizations, including one run by prominent Republican Grover Norquist, "appear to have perpetrated a fraud" on taxpayers by selling their clout to lobbyist Jack Abramoff, Senate investigators said in a report issued yesterday.

The report includes previously unreleased e-mails between the now-disgraced lobbyist and officers of the nonprofit groups, showing that Abramoff funneled money from his clients to the groups. In exchange, the groups, among other things, produced ostensibly independent newspaper op-ed columns or news releases that favored the clients' positions.


Special Report

Abramoff, the once-powerful lobbyist at the center of a wide-ranging public corruption investigation, was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison on March 29, after pleading guilty to fraud, tax evasion and conspiracy to bribe public officials in a deal that required him to provide evidence about members of Congress.


Officers of the groups "were generally available to carry out Mr. Abramoff's requests for help with his clients in exchange for cash payments," said the report, issued by the Senate Finance Committee."

-----------

I guess one way or another this will all come out in the course of the investigation.
Rena Bernard said…
Thanks for that update, Anon. I hadn't seen that bit of info on Norquist and his group. I don't really cotton much (excuse my Southernism) to the idea of the Flat Tax so I haven't followed the news on this organization.

Seems to me though that the group would be within its rights to hire a lobbyist. Heck, any group worth a hill of beans would be enlisting the services of a lobbyist to move their agenda forward. Abramoff has a bad name but if it hadn't been him, it might have been any other lobbyist.

Frankly, I'm a FairTax advocate so it wouldn't bother me too much if Norquist's group got bogged down in court! I think the Flat Tax is just another way for the federal government to continue their practice of penalizing productivity.

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Friday Night with Hugh and Friends

The consummate Conservative host, Hugh Hewitt, and yours truly! Shameless of me to post this, I know; however, I'm too jazzed to care. :-p What a wonderful way to spend a Friday night! After an hour or so wandering through some of the exhibits at the Frazier Historical Arms Museum, I then got to spend three hours with Hugh Hewitt and 599 other fans of his show. I absolutely MUST say that not only was Hugh wonderful and the live show very entertaining, but his fans are absolutely the nicest people! I've seen other radio talk show s done live and mingled with fans of those shows. Hugh Hewitt's fans are the nicest, most down to earth, friendly people I've ever met. It's quite a credit to Hugh that he draws such a fan base. If you haven't been to the Frazier Historical Arms Museum here in Louisville, it's a must-see. The museum shows an amazing artistry with the exhibits and places them in the context of the times in a very entertaining and educationa...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...