Skip to main content

What part of AMERICAN do they not understand?

If a Martian lands on American soil, is he then automatically American and entitled to all the rights and liberties enjoyed by legal Americans citizens? I know that's a ridiculous question but this issue of extending American civil liberties to non-Americans has just reached ridiculous levels. From NewsMax today, comes this gem ("ACLU Sues Texas Town for Not Renting to Illegals") of real-life absurdity:

"Two civil rights groups filed a lawsuit Tuesday challenging a suburb's new law that outlaws renting to illegal immigrants, alleging the ordinance violates federal law and forces landlords to act as immigration officers." ...
And, note the names of these "civil rights" groups (emphasis mine):
... "The American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund filed the suit on behalf of Farmers Branch residents and landlords." ...
Do the names of these organizations not explicitly identify that their purpose is to defend Americans? Whether Mexican-American, Irish-American, African-American, Polish-American, or whatever hyphenated-American with which one chooses to identify himself, one fact remains: Americans are people who, whether yesterday or centuries ago, were either (a) born in this country or (b) entered this country legally and swore allegiance to our country. It's really that simple. What part of "American" do these groups not understand?!


I often wonder why the ACLU and other organizations like it don't simply eliminate the "American" from their names and be done with it. Sheesh.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Did you really ask, "Do the names of these organizations not explicitly identify that their purpose is to defend Americans? " Are you serious? The purpose of these organizations is to defend American Civil Liberties - that means American FREEDOM, the very thing you assert you would defend. I often wonder how long America will survive when its citizens demonstrate they have no clue as to the basic American Values and Principles that make us so different.
Rena Bernard said…
Yes, I did. "AMERICAN Civil Liberties" is an explicit statement that what these people claim to defend are the civil liberties of Americans. American values are different from the civil liberties which we are granted by the Constitution as AMERICANS.

I absolutely believe in the values that we Americans hold dear; however, civil liberties are granted by the Constitution and by our government, hence the term "civil."

Until a person becomes an American, he or she cannot assume that American Civil Liberties apply to him/her. They do not.

I don't think that American values are held only by Americans. Many people value freedom, empowerment, achievement, and intellectual discourse. To assume those are soley American values is faulty at best.

I'm glad you commented on this, Bill. It's interesting to hear what the thinking is on this from someone who subscribes to a different political ideology. I simply think we are confusing the term "civil" with "God-granted."
Anonymous said…
Perhaps you see it the same way I see the term 'family' as used by various organizations. I see their use of the term 'family' as an effort to gain legitimacy, as in 'Focus on the Family,' and the 'Family Foundation,' etc., to force THEIR family values on America - but then, there was a Manson Family, too.
Rena Bernard said…
I don't see the term "American" any differently than what I stated in the post. The term "civil" is well-defined in that context too. Those are very well-defined terms.

However, we certainly might have some agreement with the names used by Christian organizations to further their agendas of trying to control personal -- and in the true Conservative sense, non-governmental -- matters by using the term "family."

To some degree though, you must admit, that the word family can be defined many ways, including the traditional Christian idea of what family means. So, they are within the definition of that word but actually discuss only the Christian (or traditional), idea of family. They might more accurately name themselves "Focus on the Christian Family" or "Focus on the Traditional Family."

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Friday Night with Hugh and Friends

The consummate Conservative host, Hugh Hewitt, and yours truly! Shameless of me to post this, I know; however, I'm too jazzed to care. :-p What a wonderful way to spend a Friday night! After an hour or so wandering through some of the exhibits at the Frazier Historical Arms Museum, I then got to spend three hours with Hugh Hewitt and 599 other fans of his show. I absolutely MUST say that not only was Hugh wonderful and the live show very entertaining, but his fans are absolutely the nicest people! I've seen other radio talk show s done live and mingled with fans of those shows. Hugh Hewitt's fans are the nicest, most down to earth, friendly people I've ever met. It's quite a credit to Hugh that he draws such a fan base. If you haven't been to the Frazier Historical Arms Museum here in Louisville, it's a must-see. The museum shows an amazing artistry with the exhibits and places them in the context of the times in a very entertaining and educationa...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...