Skip to main content

The First Amendment: It's not just for journalists!

Who the freak is this clown?? William M. Arkin can kiss my lily white America-loving arse. I know it's the Washington Post and this tripe is to be expected; however, this goes WELL beyond the pale. How dare he?!
... "These soldiers should be grateful that the American public, which by all polls overwhelmingly disapproves of the Iraq war and the President's handling of it, do still offer their support to them, and their respect." ...

WHAT?! Read the blog post. Defenders of our sovereignty and of our freedoms deserve SO much better than the shite this guy spewed on the WaPo blog. They deserve our respect -- which Arkin's blog post clearly shows they are NOT getting from certain segments of America even though he claims they are -- and our admiration for the honorable way in which they are fighting this war.

I don't blame our troops a bit for pointing out that somehow they are supposed to believe that some Americans support THEM but do not support the cause for which they are putting their lives on the line. Interestingly enough, this a-hole Arkin chose to overlook the fact that the troops he criticizes for expressing their opinions support the American people on a 24x7 basis. They lay their lives on the line for our freedoms -- how much more support does Arkin expect? Geez!

Whether you agree or disagree with our presence in Iraq, you have to admit that this guy's thesis is all freaked up. He's basically saying that our troops ought to just shut up. Are they not entitled to the same First Amendment rights that all Americans enjoy? Hey, last I heard, the First Amendment applies to ALL Americans, not just wrong-headed journalists!

If you're steaming like I am, you'll want to skin this guy alive. Okay, that was a little severe. Sorry. At a minimum, you'll want to let him know that his ill-considered and bizarre opinion is not the opinion of we America-loving citizens who truly appreciate the sacrifices made daily by these honorable troops and their families.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Three Things No One Else Is Telling You

From: Downsizer Dispatch < downsizer-dispatch@downsizedc.org > Date: Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:38 PM Subject: Three Things No One Else Is Telling You To: conservachick@gmail.com Quote of the Day: "Things in our country run in spite of the government, not by the aid of it." -- Will Rogers (1879-1935) American humorist Unelected federal bureaucrats are forcing New York City to spend $27 million to replace their street signs. Our bureaucratic overlords maintain that streets signs must contain both upper and lower case letters, instead of just capital letters! Do you feel grateful that you're being protected from upper case streets signs? This dictatorial mandate comes from the Federal Highway Administration, and applies to every community in America, not just New York City. But don't blame this outrage on the busy-body Democrats. This isn't an Obama directive. The rule was actually promulgated back in 2003 -- during the Bush Administrat...