Skip to main content

Columbia's School of Hypocrisy

I have to wonder why Columbia University would invite the man who is waging a proxy war against our troops and killing Americans on a regular basis to speak... The same militantly religious zealot who ships IEDs into Iraq... what might Columbia's students learn from his speech?

This is the same school which denies American military recruiters access to its student body, which (I believe) bans the American ROTC from having a chapter on its campus, yet INVITES AN ISLAMOFACIST to speak to its student body. What type of recruiting might Columbia be endorsing?! Hypocrites.

(Congrats to our troops for pulling Iranian Qud in for questioning! Nice work, guys!)

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hypocrisy? How about the President and faculty at Duke concerning the wrongly charged lacrosse players. As far as they are concerned even innocence is not a defense to false charges by a drugged out black prostitute against middle class white males.
10/02/2007 11:36:00 PM
Rena Bernard said…
I hear ya, Monkfish. I called it a "school of hypocrisy" because the president of Columbia claimed to favor free speech. Not so much, eh?

The only speech that's free on campus these days is speech from the radical Left. It's disgusting that so many "institutes of higher learning" have become nothing more than Marxist echo chambers. I fart in their general direction!
10/03/2007 06:48:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...
22 comments
Read more

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...
19 comments
Read more

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...
15 comments
Read more