Skip to main content

Worth More than 1,000 Words

I received the following headlines and photos via email a few days ago. I'm sure many of my Conservative readers have seen this already but, since some of ConservaChick's friends are probably NOT on the Conservative distribution list, I thought I'd share it here as well.

This is how a US Senator looks upon a crook:

["Why Norm! Is that a bundle in your pocket or are ya just happy to see me?!"]


...and, this is how a US Senator looks upon an American hero:


["I see no bundle in your pocket, General Petraeus. Are you not happy to see me?"]

These pictures are worth more than a thousand words. They those of us who value our military heroes everything we need to know about Hillary Clinton and the Clinton regime.


[Thanks for sending this my way, Mom!]

Comments

Anonymous said…
Picture number one... reminds me of the scene in Natl Lampoons Vegas Vacation where the old guy wins the keeno at the end. "I won! I won da money! Money, money, money! I won!"

Picture number two... probably how she looks at Bill when he lights up a cigar. lol
10/18/2007 02:47:00 PM
TheMcG said…
You forgot to put up the photos of Bush and Jack, or Cheney and Scooter...

Of course, you didn't forget, your bias just runs one way!

Just like you'll delete this message, as god forbid people recognize that the donkey and elephant are equally corruptible, statistics lie, as do photos of people standing side by side.

There's this old saying involving, let me see, stones and glass houses...
12/12/2007 07:34:00 PM
Rena Bernard said…
Well Rich, first of all let me say thank you for posting a comment and actually using a name! Kudos! It's not often that "drive by" readers bother to make themselves seem more like the rest of us (presentable).

I would imagine that when you saw the name of my blog ("ConservaChick") you didn't immediately think to yourself, "Now THERE'S an unbiased blogger!" Am I correct?

Of course I'm biased! I make no bones about it. I believe WHOLEHEARTEDLY that Conservatism is the one political ideology that honors the spirit of individualism that makes this country exceptional among the countries and nation states of the world. I am DEFINITELY not unbiased in that respect.

Do I think that GOP politicians are any less corruptible than Dem politicians? Nope. I am a realist. Big money makes big friends. It's a fact and it's here to stay. However, because my blog is my realm, I get to choose my jabs when I write new posts. Truth be told, I am totally convinced of the corruptness of the Clinton machine and it's connection with China. It's no mistake that all those "bundled" contributions were from poor Chinese immigrants.

It's obvious to me that you're a "drive by" reader, Rich. You taunt me as if you expect me to censor your commentary. I suppose you're not aware of my "No Censorship" policy at ConservaChick. I do not, nor will I ever, censor the comments section of my blog. I think it's best to let comments stand as their own testament to the intellect of those who choose to comment. So, my new found friend, feel free to rant any time you like about the white-male imposed slavery of others to the corporate machine, about how America is a bully unworthy of respect, and about how American society is unjust to "free thinkers." I'll never censor a single comment. The comments section is your soap box; step on up any time! Enjoy yourself.

Thanks for stopping by, Rich.
12/13/2007 11:22:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...
22 comments
Read more

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...
19 comments
Read more

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...
15 comments
Read more