Skip to main content

Participate in the State of the Union tonight with the NRCC

The NRCC is making an online chat available to Republicans today/tonight to discuss the State of Obama speech. Here's the scoop, directly from their email to me today.



Tonight Barack Obama will give his first State of the Union address, and try to explain why he failed to deliver on every promise he made upon taking office.

This year's State of the Union address will be a key moment for Democrats and we want to hear your thoughts and questions as it happens. We have two ways for you play an active role in the GOP discussion during and after the speech.
  • Beginning right now through the address, if you text Union to 777218 you will receive information and a link to participate in our online text chat room.
  • Immediately after the speech I invite you to pose questions to House Republicans who will answer your questions via streaming video. Please go to http://nrcc.org/stateoftheunion/ to participate.
Both of these opportunities allow you to have your voice heard, learn inside information about where the Republican Party stands heading into the mid-term elections and interact with guests such as Former Congressman Tom Davis, Grover Norquist, Fred and Jeri Thompson to name a few.

I hope you'll take advantage of these special opportunities by texting Union to 777218 today and visiting www.nrcc.org/stateoftheunion/.

Sincerely,
 
Pete Sessions, NRCC Chairman

P.S. You have the unique opportunity to participate in an online text chat room with key members of the Republican Party during this year's State of the Union and pose questions to Republican Members of the House after the speech. Text Union to 777218 to receive your link to the chat room and visit http://nrcc.org/stateoftheunion/ to participate in the video streaming.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...
19 comments
Read more

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...
22 comments
Read more

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...
15 comments
Read more