Skip to main content

Breaking News...

A recent commenter to this blog is writing his own blog as part of a school assignment. Apparently, he has been asked to follow two political blogs -- one Liberal and one Conservative. It seems my little ConservaChick blog will be the Conservative one.

Ladies and Gentleman, meet Daniel Clugston via his blog "What makes MY head hurt!!!"

If you have a moment, Daniel, would you mind posting a little about yourself (how old you are, where you live, and your political leanings for example) as a comment to this post? What exactly is your assignment for Government class?

Good luck with your assignment, Daniel -- It's a wild and wooly world of political opinions out here in the blogosphere! I'll be sure to tell you what makes MY head hurt politically. ;o)

Comments

Rena Bernard said…
Daniel, thanks for telling us more about you. You are in what is often referred to by some as "flyover country." There are a lot of Liberals who think that the only areas of this country that count are on the coast (LA, NY, DC, etc.).

It sure seems to me, based on your comments and on the fact that you've been assigned to follow politics via blogs that those Liberals ought to be paying a lot more attention to states like Kansas!

Do you follow the votes of your US Senators and Representatives from Kansas? It seems to me that your Senators -- Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts -- are pretty good Conservatives!

I hope you'll feel free to add your comments to any of my posts here on ConservaChick. I'm very interested in what younger people are thinking about our government. You are truly the future of this nation. Be sure to get out and exercise your first vote this year! I was thrilled when I got to vote for the first time!

What are you supposed to learn from following one Conservative and one Liberal blog? Is there something you have to turn in at the end of this assignment for a grade? I sure hope my blogging about you and your project earns you some extra credit too!

All the best,
Dawn

Popular posts from this blog

As the Blog Turns...

Gee. I have found myself fascinated by the soap opera unfolding in the comments section of this blog since last night. One little mention on a controversial Democrat's blog and it's High Noon on ConservaChick! (Yes, I'm laughing while I type this.) For those of you who have no idea what's happening in the ever-expanding comments section , join the club! Here's what I know about Mark Nickolas from bits and pieces I've read on his blog, and from a local news report: Nickolas likes to sneer at Republicans and call them snide little nicknames as he provides his "Unfiltered and Candid Look at Politics, Politicians and the Media in Kentucky;" he raised a ruckus within the Democrat party here in Kentucky by filing a suit against the chairman of the party , Jerry Lundergan; and he will be appearing on the same panel with yours truly on Thursday night. That's about it. You now have the benefit of my not-so-extensive knowledge on this subject. Nickolas poste...

Is conscription the prescription?

US Representative, Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is at it again. Rangel's prescription for fixing the ills we're feeling in Iraq is a draft . I have very mixed feelings about this. Conscription is conscription no matter what you choose to label it. Is that appropriate in a free country? On the flip side of this coin, I've often thought that compulsory national service would be a great idea for American kids right out of high school. It might have been a better start for me than learning to down beer at a Liberal Arts university! Two years in the service might give kids time to think about their future, learn higher levels of responsibility, and begin to take life more seriously. There are many countries who require some level of mandatory military service: Belarus, Chile, China, Croatia, Serbia, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, our neighbor Mexico, and our old buddy Germany, to name a few. Gee, now that I look at that partial list... aren't many of those countries Socialist or at battl...

Pol Watchers Responds

I think it's important for anyone with a voice on the internet to present all sides of an issue. In that spirit, I am posting the response I received via email from John Stamper of the Lexington Herald-Leader to the piece I wrote about censorship on blogs: "Your post about Pol Watchers does not contain the entire thread of comments, as your blog states. If you go to the post in question , you will see that there has been no effort to eliminate comments just because they question Jonathan Miller and Mark Nickolas. Plenty of them still remain. However, as stated in my comment on Pol Watchers, we're not going to allow people to use the blog as a forum for name calling. It's that simple. Check around, it's a pretty common policy. For example, blogs at WashingtonPost.com have this policy: 'User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsi...